Bug report commit request

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> >> > What about the LICENSE=NONE setting ? It stops the port from being build in poudriere ?

> > So, does it sound sensible to define a LICENSE that one has to special-case
> > immediatly just to do a test-build ? I mean, don't we all have better things
> > to do than shooting ourselves in the feet ?
> 
> There is really no license information about this software. So
> according to license framework of FreeBSD ports there isn't anything
> wrong about adding 'LICENSE=NONE' in Makefile of this port.

The same is true for not adding a LICENSE line in this case.

>  And if it
> is really problematic then what should be fixed is license framework
> itself or behavior of poudriere about it rather than license
> information of this port. Ad-hocism doesn't pay in the long run.

There is no other LICENSE=NONE instance in the ports tree.

-- 
pi at opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    One year to go !