python36 is still broken.

[Steve Kargl]

On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:49:46PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:41 AM Steve Kargl
> <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> > This has been reported for many years and there are open bug reports.
> > Any chance that the this will be fixed.
> >
> >
> > --- work/Python-3.6.9/Modules/mathmodule.c.orig 2019-12-06 10:33:39.232673000 -0800
> > +++ work/Python-3.6.9/Modules/mathmodule.c      2019-12-06 10:34:53.288616000 -0800
> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
> >  static const double logpi = 1.144729885849400174143427351353058711647;
> >
> >  static double
> > -sinpi(double x)
> > +a_really_bad_idea_sinpi(double x)
> >  {
> >      double y, r;
> >      int n;
> > @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
> >         integer. */
> >      if (absx > 200.0) {
> >          if (x < 0.0) {
> > -            return 0.0/sinpi(x);
> > +            return 0.0/a_really_bad_idea_sinpi(x);
> >          }
> >          else {
> >              errno = ERANGE;
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> WIthout context it's hard to advise. What PRs with that patch exist?
> Have they been responded to or have they been ignored? Team immunity
> from PR timeouts no longer exists, so if the problem needs a fix let's
> fix it.
> 

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792

As noted in the PR, it has been reported to the lists

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-June/109093.html
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-September/110229.html

I'll refrain from commenting further.

-- 
Steve