Default python is 3.6?

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:29 PM Steve Kargl
<sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:14:19PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Steve Kargl
> > >
> > > Doesn't matter what the python developer have done.
> >
> > Thanks, I see that you really appreciate my work...
> >
>
> Your work is appreciated as much as my last 3 years of efforts
> to get a trivially stupid patch acknowledged by python at freebsd.
>
> Why is it so harder for python at freebsd to do
>
> svn add files/patch-Modules___mathmodule.c
> svn commit files/patch-Modules___mathmodule.c
>
FreeBSD has at least 4 active branches of Python, I gather
(different "flavors" of one meta-port, lang/python, see
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/flavors-auto-python.html)).
They
are sufficiently different (at least Python 2.7  and Python 3.7 are sufficiently
different to require different patches).

So there is more "software bureaucracy" here than just applying one patch.
And https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792
has just one patch attached.
I am not sure how to create patches for flavored ports.

Dima



> ?
>
> --
> Steve