Not much reason to have */R-cran-* ports

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hello,

Eugene wrote:
> It is a bit funny you are bothered on 250 R-cran-* ports when we
> have 1908 p5-* ports, 964 py-* ports, 600 rubygem-* ports and
> 280 hs-* ports in the single ports/devel category.

This is an important point. Every toolchain does its own dependency
tracking etc. So maybe it's time to get those folks together
and discuss a common subset so that systems can maintain that
and not 5-10 seperate systems.

-- 
pi at opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         2 years to go !