category qt?

[Mathieu Arnold]

On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:06:56AM +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree.
> 
> It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I think it
> is easier to find (and also easier to maintain).

While a virtual category could easily be added (by having USES=qt add it
automatically) a physical category makes little sense.  It would be like
having all the p5- ports put in a perl directory.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20181224/29653944/attachment.sig>