New virtual (physical?) ports category: blockchain

[Pete Wright]

On 12/6/18 5:28 PM, Robert wrote:
> So most of blockchain implementations and related libs reside in 
> finance\net-p2p categories, I think neither of these sounds as a good 
> category name.
>
> So I propose to move them into a separate category and name it: 
> blockchain (tada).
>
> The list of candidates we already have is definitely larger than 
> vietnamese\ukrainian etc so maybe worth a separate physical category? 
> (though not as large as x11-clocks yet but I believe much more is 
> coming...).
>
wow that's more ports than I had realized were available, and i think it 
would be something that would help me personally.  The only nit I have 
is that many of these seem to be crypto-currency specific.  Reason I 
mention it is I think we'll see more blockchain tools come out that 
don't necessarily deal with crypto-currencies.

Although it's a pretty silly differentiation to make that most people 
won't really care about :)  +1 from me!

-pete

-- 
Pete Wright
pete at nomadlogic.org
@nomadlogicLA