svn commit: r475644 - head/databases/mantis

[Tobias Kortkamp]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, at 22:49, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On Jul 29, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Jochen Neumeister <joneum at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Author: joneum
> > Date: Sun Jul 29 10:51:37 2018
> > New Revision: 475644
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/475644
> > 
> > Log:
> >  databases/mantis: Update to 2.15.0
> > 
> >  Changelog: https://mantisbt.org/bugs/changelog_page.php?project=mantisbt&version=2.15.0
> > 
> >  PR:		229880
> >  Submitted by:	Nathan <ndowens.fbsd at yandex.com>
> >  MFH:		2018Q3
> >  Security:	0822a4cf-9318-11e8-8d88-00e04c1ea73d
> > 
> > Modified:
> >  head/databases/mantis/Makefile
> >  head/databases/mantis/distinfo
> 
> This version fails to run for me.  The vendor directory is missing.  
> This is the error I get:
> 
> [Mon Aug 20 20:40:14.528249 2018] [:error] [pid 73365] [client redacted] 
> PHP Warning:  require_once(/usr/local/www/mantis/vendor/autoload.php): 
> failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/local/www/
> mantis/core.php on line 71
> [Mon Aug 20 20:40:14.528317 2018] [:error] [pid 73365] [client redacted] 
> PHP Fatal error:  require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/local/
> www/mantis/vendor/autoload.php' (include_path='/usr/local/share/pear') 
> in /usr/local/www/mantis/core.php on line 71
> 
> Is this working for anyone?
> 
> There was no vendor directory in the 2.6.0 tarball.  There isn't one in 
> the 2.15.0 tarball either, but the code definitely references it.
> 
> Upstream inquires 
> (https://mantisbt.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=66190#p66190 
> <https://mantisbt.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=66190#p66190>) indicate we 
> should be using Sourceforge downloads, not GitHub
> 
> The vendor directory is present in the SF tarball at 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mantisbt/files/mantis-stable/2.16.0/ 
> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/mantisbt/files/mantis-stable/2.16.0/>
> 
> I tried last night to update the port, but failed.
> 
> Ideas please?

Hi,

could you test the update to 2.16.0 on https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16890 ?
I've switched it over to the SF tarball and it seems to work ok
for me, but would appreciate a confirmation from someone else that
it works before committing it.

Thanks!