/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk and r450351
Keith Hellman
khellman at mcprogramming.com
Mon Sep 25 01:25:28 UTC 2017
Hello all,
I'm running
FreeBSD dane.localdomain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r320599
with a ports tree synced with svn and package update management with
portmaster(8). I synced the tree up to 450554 today and portmaster
spat out the following.
/usr/ports# portmaster -m BATCH=yes -D --update-if-newer --no-confirm -a
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 1439: Cannot open /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk
make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
This occurs for what appears to be six of the ports I have installed.
I notice that r450351--r450354 deal with execinfo, specifically r450351
removes execinfo support. The ports complaining for my own situation
were:
devel/qt5-core
x11-toolkits/wxgtk30
devel/cmake
sysutils/fusefs-ext4fuse
lang/ruby23
I've remove the execinfo USES references in these ports' Makefiles and
portmaster no longer complains during the update.
I'm still cutting my teeth on freebsd's ports system, I'm unsure if I
should submit a PR about this (a grep command seemed to find about 163
instances of USES containing execinfo) or if I simply don't realize I
that I've hosed my ports tree :/
TiA for any advice,
--
Keith Hellman #include <disclaimer.h>
khellman at mcprogramming.com from disclaimer import standard
khellman at mines.edu gpg key 9FCF40FD
freenode.net as mrtuple
If they want really buzzword-compliant "redundancy" they could add
another exchange server as part of a "cluster" of "Windows 2003"
servers with "active directory" so that when things break they
break spectacularly.
-- Jim Ockers, P.Eng. (http://www.ockers.net/); CLUE-Tech mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20170924/38580847/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list