poudriere + bdb6 build issue (maybe newbie stupidity)

Adam Weinberger adamw at adamw.org
Wed May 10 19:54:56 UTC 2017


> On 10 May, 2017, at 13:12, Mike Andrews <mandrews at bit0.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 10 May 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> 
>>> On 10 May, 2017, at 10:59, Mike Andrews <mandrews at bit0.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’m experimenting with poudriere for the first time and running into an issue with some ports that use BDB.  With this in make.conf:
>>> 
>>> DEFAULT_VERSIONS= bdb=6
>>> 
>>> I get this for four ports that use BDB 6:
>>> 
>>> [00:00:47] ====>> [04][00:00:00] Finished build of databases/p5-BerkeleyDB: Ignored: cannot install: no eligible BerkeleyDB version. Requested: 6, incompatible: . Try: make debug-bdb
>>> [00:00:47] ====>> [03][00:00:00] Finished build of databases/ruby-bdb: Ignored: cannot install: no eligible BerkeleyDB version. Requested: 6, incompatible: . Try: make debug-bdb
>>> [00:00:48] ====>> [06][00:00:01] Finished build of www/webalizer: Ignored: cannot install: no eligible BerkeleyDB version. Requested: 6, incompatible: . Try: make debug-bdb
>>> [00:00:49] ====>> [01][00:00:01] Finished build of textproc/redland: Ignored: cannot install: no eligible BerkeleyDB version. Requested: 6, incompatible: . Try: make debug-bdb
>>> 
>>> Installing the ports manually from source works just fine.
>>> 
>>> Am I missing something stupid/obvious here, or is it an issue with those specific four ports?
>> 
>> There's a licensing-related peculiarity with bdb 6. Add WITH_BDB6_PERMITTED=yes to your make.conf and it should build for you.
> 
> That fixed it, thanks!
> 
> Now where is that documented?  Anywhere?  Now that I Google that option, okay, it's in bdb.mk, but...  hard to do that if you don't know it's there.  :)
> 
> I did (do) have DISABLE_LICENSES=yes in there, but that's more to disable prompts at 'poudriere options' time, I guess.

WITH_BDB6_PERMITTED is pretty unnecessary, AFAICT; bsd.licenses.mk is the right way to handle license selection. I've opened a phabricator review (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10669) to just simply remove it, but because bsd.mk is convoluted I'm not entirely positive that this change has no other side effects.

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
adamw at adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org



More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list