openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client (Miroslav Lachman)

[Lee Brown]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd at quip.cz> wrote:
> Lee Brown wrote on 2017/01/11 00:31:
>>>
>>> Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30:
>>>>
>>>> On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
>>>>> both samba44
>>>>> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
>>>>> Or samba44 and KDE?
>>>>>
>>>>> If yes, then that sucks...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
>>>> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
>>>> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see
>>>> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the
>>>> complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable
>>>> this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different
>>>> licenses)?
>>>
>>>
>>> And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly?
>>> We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper
>>> variable / option for this.
>>>
>>> Miroslav Lachman
>>
>> (sorry for losing the headers, I had to copy/paste this as I switched
>> from digest to individual).
>>
>> Is there a satisfactory answer to Miroslav's question?
>>
>> I'm in the same predicament, I can't upgrade anything without removing
>> libreoffice, presumably because of samba.
>> I've tried looking through the tree of options for libreoffice and
>> samba, but I'm at a loss.
>
>
> It should be fixed now in the ports tree. I don't know when new packages
> will be available for pkg install / pkg upgrade.
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=431079
>
> Miroslav Lachman
>
Oh awesome, that should be ready for me tomorrow morning then (I build
by own too).
Thank you -- lee