The future of portmaster

[George Mitchell]

On 02/17/17 02:37, abi wrote:
> 17.02.2017 00:22, Chris H пишет:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot
>> <baho-utot at columbus.rr.com> wrote
>>
>>> [...]
>> Hello. You shouldn't have any difficulty accomplishing your goal
>> by simply setting up a jail, and using portmaster within that jail(8).
>> portmaster really doesn't care where it's run. So long as it has
>> everything it needs to accomplish it's job(s). :-)
>>
> From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and
> it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment.
> 
Some of us might even consider chroot overkill.  I'm fine with a
chroot option, but let's not turn portmaster into something that
unconditionally requires more resources than the underlying build
needs.                                                  -- George


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20170217/d68026d7/attachment.sig>