Procmail Vulnerabilities check

[Carmel NY]

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:35:55 +0100, Jos Chrispijn stated:

>On 8-12-2017 17:58, Warren Block wrote:
>> procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the 
>> time.  Consider maildrop as a more powerful and more maintained 
>> replacement that is pretty easy to implement:  
>I know - but I can remember that procmail should be installed also when 
>using Postfix.
>Might be wrong here...

A Postfix / Dovecot with sieve combination is a far more powerful combination
and it is fully supported.

-- 
Carmel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20171213/981e4479/attachment.sig>