private ports and pkgs versioning

Thomas Mueller mueller6724 at bellsouth.net
Tue Oct 18 07:31:54 UTC 2016


> Is there a standard way of naming a pkg that is locally compiled (maybe with a
> different set of options, or a local patch) so that it doesn't get confused
> with generic ports that are from freeBSD.org?

> I want to use mostly standard pkgs but need to compile a few myself (this
> can't be an uncommon requirement).
        
> How can I name my variant pkgs so the the pkg program (and ports) can still
> know that it is a satisfactory supplier of prerequisite components?

> e.g.  if a pkg wants a specific rev of libxml2 how much does it use of the
> name libxml2-2.9.2_2 ?
        
> Can (should) I add stuff after the '_'?  If I do will it still recognise my
> pkg file and if I do are there any rules regarding *WHAT* I can put there.

> lastly is there somewhere I should be looking to read all this information
> rather than pestering the mailing list?

> What I'd like to have is my own depot with something like:

===

> libsmi-0.4.8_1.txz
> libxcb-1.11.1.txz
> libxml2-2.9.2_2-mumble.3.txz
> lsof-4.88,8.txz
> lsof-4.90.b,8.txz
> m4-1.4.17_1,1.txz

===

> where 'mumble.3' is a locally defined addition, but all the rest of the pkgs
> are straight from pkg.freebsd.org, (or at least compile in default form).

> This "kind-of" works, but the rules of play are not defined anyhere I have
> read, so I don't know if it's going to suddenly fail one day.

> Also it's be really nice if there were a variable I could set to "mumble.3" so
> that I don't have to do a manual rename, because between the time that the
> package is made and it is renamed there is a 'misnamed' package sitting around
> acting as a potential source of confusion.

> thanks,


> Julian

I too might like to compile something not in the ports tree, would like to make a category "mystuff" but don't really know how to make it work.

I might get an error message for invalid category, as happened to me once in NetBSD with pkgsrc, and I also don't want it to be changed by svn update, or cvs update in the case of NetBSD and pkgsrc.

One package of possible interest is Steffen Daode Nurpmeso's s-nail, to be renamed to s-mailx, which is an update to heirloom-mailx and mailx or nail; included in Arch Linux and OpenBSD ports.

Or maybe I want to test a modification to an existing package.

Tom



More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list