Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other?

Marko Cupać marko.cupac at mimar.rs
Mon Feb 29 07:35:05 UTC 2016


On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:11:36 -0500
Chris Inacio <nacho319 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I was considering adding some more support into some tooling/ports for
> FreeBSD and I thought it would probably be good to get configuration
> management support some thought.  So I can understand under certain
> Linux flavors (e.g. RedHat) that puppet is the de facto choice -
> since the distribution packager has chosen one.
> 
> Is there a dominant one for FreeBSD?
> 
> Happy if you would just reply with which one, if any, you use.  If
> you want to add more to the conversation, that's fine.  I understand
> the mailing list I posted this to and the likely audience - as I said
> I started think about this from adding more support into some ports.

For my relatively simple task of occasional push of identical
configuration files to dozens of jails I use salt.
-- 
Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.
After  enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.

Marko Cupać
https://www.mimar.rs/


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list