'porting' AMD compiler suite

[Mehmet Erol Sanliturk]

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William A. Mahaffey III <wam at hiwaay.net>
wrote:

> On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
>> On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam at hiwaay.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
>>> be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for
>>> different architectures, see attached orig-Makefile.
>>>
>> Have you tried using gmake, rather than the base make?
>>
>>
>
> Hmmmm .... No, I didn't :-/ .... Did I mention pilot error ? I thought the
> system make was a version of gmake, but apparently not, right ? Thanks,
> I'll try that & see how it goes ....
>
> --
>
>         William A. Mahaffey III
>
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
>          ever devised by man."
>                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>

FreeBSD make and GNU make are different species ( means not compatible ) .


If you compare building of GCC in FreeBSD and Linux , you may model
building of Open64 in FreeBSD with respect to building in Linux .


If I were you , I would not work on Open64 because GCC is much better than
Open64 with respect to my opinion . In Linux , I have checked Open64 for
using it , but I have abandoned that idea , because at least it does not
have 128 bit floating point numbers ( if it is not included yet ) .


It may be said that it is abandoned :


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open64
http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/cpu-development/x86-open64-compiler-suite/


https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/

https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/Open64-5.0/


http://www.open64.net/

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk