FreeBSD Port: ruby20-2.0.0.645,1 - reported as vulnerable while it isn't ?

[Steve Wills]

Hi,

Did you build your own ports where ruby 2.0 was default? I see the package name
here is ruby-2.0.0.645,1, not ruby20-2.0.0.645,1. The entries in vuxml look
like this:

 3326         <name>ruby20</name>
 3327         <range><lt>2.0.0.645,1</lt></range>

...

 3330         <name>ruby</name>
 3331         <range><lt>2.1.6,1</lt></range>

So I think maybe it's matching the second entry and then looking for a ruby
version 2.1.6,1 or newer. Not sure what the right solution is for this right
now.

Steve


On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 08:43:33AM +0200, Ing. Břetislav Kubesa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> already for longer time while updating to 2.0.0.645,1 version, I'm 
> getting message that it's vulnerable, but I think it's not the case as 
> vulnerable are ruby20 < 2.0.0.645,1 (but it's not ruby20 <= 2.0.0.645,1).
> However I'm not sure where to report it for checking, so I hope it's the 
> right place here.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> --->  Upgrading 'ruby-2.0.0.643_1,1' to 'ruby-2.0.0.645,1' (lang/ruby20)
> --->  Building '/usr/ports/lang/ruby20'
> ===>  Cleaning for ruby-2.0.0.645,1
> ===>  ruby-2.0.0.645,1 has known vulnerabilities:
> ruby-2.0.0.645,1 is vulnerable:
> Ruby -- OpenSSL Hostname Verification Vulnerability
> CVE: CVE-2015-1855
> WWW: 
> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/d4379f59-3e9b-49eb-933b-61de4d0b0fdb.html
> 
> Best regards,
> Bretislav Kubesa
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20150621/64417feb/attachment.sig>