Please help un-confuse me about vuxml

[Warren Block]

On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Matthew Seaman wrote:

> On 2015/07/03 14:01, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> And that combination of things catalyzed this note.
>>
>> Here's what I'm seeing:
>> - There is a claim that the port to which I was trying to update was
>>   "vulnerable" per vuxml.
>
> vuxml currently states that netpbm versions /less than/ 10.35.96 are
> vulnerable, and has done since about 48h ago.

I had the same problem also yesterday.  It was just a bug in the netpbm 
entry.  Date disparities are likely due to differing time zones.

Tried it just now, and the problem is fixed.