squid 3.5 plans

Nick Rogers ncrogers at gmail.com
Mon Feb 23 15:22:56 UTC 2015


On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Marko Cupać <marko.cupac at mimar.rs> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:23:15 -0500
> Robert Simmons <rsimmons0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > That is true. It looks like an update to both 3.5 and 3.4 were
> > released on the same day. How about dropping www/squid33 and creating
> > a www/squid34 port. Then updating the www/squid port to 3.5.2.
>
> I would say this is a bad idea, as squid 3.5 does not work on FreeBSD
> 10.1 with GENERIC kernel. Furthermore, it won't be fixed with
> binary patches (ie. until 10.2 or 11.0).


> I think www/squid should be recommended squid version for FreeBSD
> users. It wouldn't be appropriate to recommend version which does not
> work without recompiling kernel.
>
> We discussed it not so long ago:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freebsd-ports@freebsd.org&q=subject:%22Re%3A+www%2Fsquid+does+not+shutdown+via+rc%22&o=newest


The same kernel bug affects squid 3.4.12 (i.e., www/squid) in the same way.


>
> --
> Marko Cupać
> https://www.mimar.rs
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list