squid 3.5 plans

[Nick Rogers]

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Robert Simmons <rsimmons0 at gmail.com> wrote:

> According to the Squid website:
> "Provided for archival purposes only. Not intended for general use in
> new installations."
> This is marking all versions of Squid except 3.5
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/
>
> I would recommend removing all the older unsupported versions except 3.5.


I agree, although it looks like www/squid was just updated to 3.4.12.

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=379384


>




> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Nick Rogers <ncrogers at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It seems that squid 3.5 is becoming the latest recommended production
> > quality version. Squid 3.4.12 and 3.5.2 were just released today. What is
> > everyones thought (or the maintainers plan) on moving the www/squid port
> > from 3.4 to 3.5?
> >
> > It looks like the www/squid33 port has been kept around past its ideal
> > expiration date because of an issue with ntlm_auth affecting squid 3.4.
> > This bug has been fixed in the latest 3.4 and 3.5 release.
> > http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
> >
> > So is the idea to now move the www/squid port to 3.5, or create yet
> another
> > squid port of www/squid35 because we want to keep 3.4 as the "stable"
> > version for a while. I am just wondering because I would like to move my
> > production environment from squid 3.4 to 3.5, and am happy to contribute
> > patches to the ports tree, but am not sure what the plans are.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Nick
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>