Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11

[Chris H]

On 20 Aug 2015 19:24:08 -0000 lab at gta.com (Larry Baird) wrote

> We have serveral headless FreeBSD servers that use the ghostscript nox11
> port.  We currently compile all of the ports on these boxes and have
> "OPTIONS_UNSET=X11" configured in /etc/make.conf.  Just in case we ever
> switched to pre-compile ports, my vote would be for Plan B. But as long as
> there is a way to not require X11 on these boxes I can live with either
> plan.
+1
I realize that plan B is a bit more work. But if I had a choice,
I'd choose plan B.

Thank you very much for all the time you're putting into this!

--Chris
> 
> Larry
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Larry Baird
> Global Technology Associates, Inc. 1992-2012     | http://www.gta.com
> Celebrating Twenty Years of Software Innovation | Orlando, FL
> Email: lab at gta.com                         | TEL 407-380-0220
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"