What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

[Gary J. Hayers]

On 26/01/2014 13:32, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Gary J. Hayers <gary at hayers.org> wrote:
>>Suspect this would work, however, the more committers the less the quality
>> of work?
> Is there any evidence to support that argument? Or is it just a fear of
> that? At any point if that happens, then this can be revoked, the selection
> can be tighter, things can be adjusted, nothing is written in stone. Also,
> people were mentioning existing commiters to be sloppy and problematic,
> we've months of waiting for PR's to be taken care of, and there are still
> ports accepted that dont work at all - is that this work quality we're so
> troubled for?
>
> B.

That's a fear admittedly, but your solution would take care of that, 
would that also mean a bigger portmgr team too?

-- 

Regards,
Gary J. Hayers
gary at hayers.org

PGP Signature
http://www.hayers.org/pgp