[HEADS UP] WITH_NEW_XORG is now the default on FreeBSD 10 and 9 stable

[Ryan Frederick]

On 04/17/2014 08:46 AM, John Marino wrote:
> On 4/17/2014 15:40, Ryan Frederick wrote:
>> On 04/17/2014 08:27 AM, John Marino wrote:
>>> On 4/17/2014 15:25, Ryan Frederick wrote:
>>>> I think the updates may have broken INDEX. Running `pkg version -Ivl
>>>> "<"` (or `pkg_version -Ivl "<"` on my non-pkgng systems) produces the
>>>> following:
>>>>
>>>> libGL-7.6.1_4                      <   needs updating (index has 9.1.7)
>>>> libdrm-2.4.17_1                    <   needs updating (index has 2.4.52)
>>>>
>>>> ...despite both ports being up to date.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you sure this isn't a NEW_XORG / OLD_XORG issue?
>>>
>>> John
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>
>>
>> I don't believe so if you mean in terms of what's set in make.conf. I've
>> never set WITH_NEW_XORG or WITHOUT_NEW_XORG in make.conf on any of my
>> systems. I did follow the instructions in UPDATING for systems that had
>> libGL and/or dri installed.
>>
>
>
> from: graphics/libGL/bsd.mesalib.mk
>
>> .if defined(WITH_NEW_XORG)
>> MESABASEVERSION=	9.1.7
>> # if there is a subversion, include the '-' between 7.11-rc2 for example.
>> MESASUBVERSION=		
>> PLIST_SUB+=	OLD="@comment " NEW=""
>> .else
>> MESABASEVERSION=	7.6.1
>> MESASUBVERSION=		
>> PLIST_SUB+=	OLD="" NEW="@comment "
>> .endif
>
>
> from: graphics/libdrm/Makefile
>
>> LIBDRM_VERSION=	2.4.52
>> LIBDRM_REVISION=0
>> PLIST_SUB+=	OLD="@comment " NEW=""
>> EXTRA_PATCHES+=	${FILESDIR}/extra-configure \
>> 		${FILESDIR}/extra-tests_modetest_Makefile.in \
>> 		${FILESDIR}/extra-tests_modetest_modetest.c \
>> 		${FILESDIR}/extra-tests_modetest_strchrnul.c \
>> 		${FILESDIR}/extra-tests__radeon__radeon_ttm.c
>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--disable-vmwgfx
>> .else
>> CONFIGURE_ARGS=	--enable-nouveau-experimental-api
>> LIBDRM_VERSION=	2.4.17
>> LIBDRM_REVISION=1
>> PLIST_SUB+=	OLD="" NEW="@comment " NOUVEAU=""
>> .endif
>>
>> .if ${ARCH} == amd64 || ${ARCH} == i386
>> PLIST_SUB+=	INTEL_DRIVER=""
>> PLIST_SUB+=	RADEON_DRIVERS=""
>> .elif ${ARCH} == ia64 || ${ARCH} == powerpc || ${ARCH} == powerpc64
>> PLIST_SUB+=	INTEL_DRIVER="@comment "
>> PLIST_SUB+=	RADEON_DRIVERS=""
>> .else
>> PLIST_SUB+=	INTEL_DRIVER="@comment "
>> PLIST_SUB+=	RADEON_DRIVERS="@comment "
>> .endif
>
>
> You see anything familiar there?
> Do you still think your issue is not related to OLD/NEW XORG?
>
> my guess is the index defaults to something your system isn't.
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>

Hah! Yes, it turns out that none of my systems are running a version 
that would have WITH_NEW_XORG set as the default by bsd.port.mk

I think this means that it's time for me to get another cup of coffee. :)

Ryan