python 2 and 3 modules
Daniel Braniss
danny at cs.huji.ac.il
Tue Sep 17 07:00:09 UTC 2013
> On 29/07/2013 5:46 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> > 2013/7/28 Daniel Braniss <danny at cs.huji.ac.il>:
> >> Hi,
> >> I need to be able to have both (2.7 and 3.2) modules.
> >> setting PYTHON_VERSION=3.2 in /etc/make.conf compiles properly,
> >> but make install, insists that that the 2.7 version is installed!
> >> after deinstalling, it will install the 3.2 version in the correct directory:
> >> /usr/local/lib/python3.2/site-path
> >> but now I lost the 2.7 version.
> >>
> >> the same happens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
> >> that the 3,2 version is installed.
> >>
> >> BTW, the comments in ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk are very confusing and
> >> some are wrong:
> >> # PYTHON_VERSION - Version of the python binary in your ${PATH}, in the
> >> # format "python2.0". Set this in your
> >> makefile in case you
> >> # want to build extensions with an
> >> older binary.
> >> # default: depends on the version of
> >> your python binary
> >>
> >> setting it to "python3.2" produces errors in the make, while 3.2 is ok
> >>
> >> is there any fix?
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> danny
> >>
> >
> > For the moment its pretty difficult to install python 2.7 and 3.3 at
> > the same time. However, if you plan to install python 3.3, you need to
> > set PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION to "python3.3" and not PYTHON_VERSION.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
>
> David,
>
> python@ would love to get a better idea (ideally a list) of where and
> what the choke-points & hurdles users are coming across trying to
> achieving this.
>
> Id be happy to document these in the wiki as we start looking forward to
> best-practice FreeBSD/Python packaging for when the
> setuptools/distribute merge commotion settles down
>
> The FreeBSD Python team can be found on FreeNode IRC (#freebsd-python)
> if anyone wants to get the ball rolling.
>
> koobs
hi all,
is there any progress?
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list