License framework

[John Marino]

On 9/3/2013 13:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>
>> My stand on it is that I don't care enough to be a beta-tester for
>> it and that I'll pick up the practice, once it's described in the
>> Porters' Handbook. Which it isn't. Why is that?
>>
> 
> A lot of things are not. It's not due to the status of a feature, just
> time. We're all volunteers.
> 

In the case of licensing, it is more than this.
There is no policy on it at all, or even declared intent.
And it's apparently not fully implemented.

It does need some official direction.  It's more than just "not written
down yet".