pkgng seems to be out of date?

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:58:55AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 7:50, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hmmm. pkg updating doesn't actually show the relevant 20130206 entry -
> > > so not actually useful.
> > >
> > 
> > pkg updating literally just reads /usr/ports/UPDATING... is your ports
> > tree up to date? Did the committer of this tcl incident commit the
> > changes before touching UPDATING and you're caught inbetween? I suppose
> > this could use a bit of investigation...
> 
> pkg updating tries match the installed packages origin in AFFECTS line, via
> strstr, in that case it does not match that is why it fails at showing it up.
> 
> I'm fixing the UPDATING entry.

In fact that would mean too many entries in AFFECTS. Best would be to improve
pkg updating matching.

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20130625/7e29d3af/attachment.sig>