security/gnupg

Chris Rees utisoft at gmail.com
Sat Feb 2 17:26:19 UTC 2013


On 2 Feb 2013 16:51, "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724 at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
> > Many users have reported in the past that one of the problems with the
> > ports system is that "OPTIONS" are not properly documented. Usually, if
> > I spend some time, I can locate it but it is a PIA. However, with the
> > "security/gnupg" port, I cannot find out specifically what this option
> > does:
>
> > [ ] STD_SOCKET  Use standard socket for agent
>
> > This is off by default. Is there any advantage to activating it and
> > why isn't it using a standard socket to begin with?
>
> > Maybe if a port had a file name "options-descr" or some such thing and
> > it listed each available option in the port and specifically what it
> > did or how it effected the operation of the application, it would prove
> > beneficial to the end use. Just my 2¢ on the matter.
>
> > Jerry
>
> I too have the problem of options being poorly documented.  I've
configured a
> port with two options that conflicted and only found out from the error
> message when the port failed to build.
>
> NetBSD pkgsrc documents the options better and notes when two options are
> incompatible with each other, or when exactly one of several options can
or
> must be chosen.
>
> I also find the dialog to be a nuisance because of messing the screen
> especially when creating a log file.  I'd like a better way of knowing
what
> options are available and being able to choose separately from building
the
> port.  With NetBSD pkgsrc, options are placed in /etc/mk.conf for NetBSD
and,
> I believe, /usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf for other OSes.

/etc/make.conf, use OPTIONS_SET=list of options.  You can also use UNSET in
the same way for the converse.  Setting BATCH=yes stops the dialogs
appearing.

Chris


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list