[HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at FreeBSD.org
Wed May 30 21:37:36 UTC 2012


On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:23:12PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 5/30/2012 3:33 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> > Folks, when moving forward with optionsng, do we want to convert
> > NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES to options everywhere? 
> 
> Absolutely not. By far the majority of users benefit from installing the
> docs and examples. Users who don't want them can continue to do what
> they've always done, configure it in make.conf. Adding OPTIONS for these
> would only cause confusion.
> 
> 
> Doug
> 
> -- 
> 
>     This .signature sanitized for your protection
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"

That is why DOS, NLS and EXAMPLES are on by default

regards
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120530/6cea792b/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list