gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT)

[coder.tuxfamily]

Le 27.05.2012 09:17, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
> On 26.05.2012 18:41 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote:
>> On 26.05.2012 17:49 (UTC+2), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>>> Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
>>>> On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>>>>> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the same problem with swig for php...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes
>>>> with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64).
>>>>
>>>> One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the
>>>> ports:
>>>>
>>>> Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least libkml?
>>>>
>>>> The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an
>>>> installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos,
>>>> graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others.
>>>>
>>>> Affected ports can be found for example with
>>>> find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13" {} \;
>>>>
>>>> I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most
>>>> other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig
>>>> 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig ports
>>>> can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which
>>>> should be changed, of course).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses swig-1.3.40.
>>> I will try without specify version of swig.
>>
>> I saw in the news on http://www.swig.org/, that swig 2.0.6 is out with
>> many bug fixes and enhancements for templates and target languages like
>> php and python. Perhaps swig 2.0.6 is ready now for gdal?
>
> I made a patch to update from swig 2.0.4 to 2.0.6. Could you please try
> if at least some of the observed problems will disappear?
>
> If this helps we should create a PR and ask the maintainer for an update.
>
>> I just checked, that swig 1.3.40 and 2.0.4 should be able to coexist at
>> the same time. At least they do not share any filenames.
>

The patch works but don't solve gdal problems. I think i've found were 
it's wrong.

For Ruby/Swig :
See the page on GDAL : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GdalOgrInRuby
SWIG 2 is required to build the Ruby bindings against Ruby 1.9.2. (SWIG 
1.3.40 is fine for Ruby 1.8.7)

When i try to compile, i've two errors :

"ogr_wrap.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be 
used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
ogr_wrap.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be 
used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC"