named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

[Jason Hellenthal]

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > 
> > Hey Doug,
> > 
> > Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening
> > ?
> 
> Yes, see below.
> 
> > If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use
> > bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) 
> 
> I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it.
> That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but
> to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for
> WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it.
> 
> 

Just to followup and say thanks again... This is what I was looking for.

I ended up with just these to accomplish what I wanted on stable/8
machines: /etc/src.conf
WITHOUT_BIND_DNSSEC=YES
WITHOUT_BIND_LIBS_LWRES=YES
WITHOUT_BIND_NAMED=YES
WITHOUT_BIND_UTILS=YES

And did not use:
WITHOUT_BIND_ETC
WITHOUT_BIND_MTREE


Works as expected. Thanks again Doug.

-- 
;s =;