Port system "problems"

[Matthew Seaman]

On 26/06/2012 08:26, Marcus von Appen wrote:
>>> 1. Ports are not modular

>> What do you mean by modular? if you are speaking about subpackages it
>> is coming,
>> but it takes time

> I hope, we are not talking about some Debian-like approach here (foo-bin,
> foo-dev, foo-doc, ....).

Actually, yes -- that's pretty much exactly what we're talking about
here.  Why do you feel subpackages would be a bad thing?

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
JID: matthew at infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120626/a3646268/signature.pgp