math/ess CONFLICTS with devel/noweb, help with CONFLICTS= needed

[Christopher J. Ruwe]

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:16:04 +0200
Mel Flynn <rflynn at acsalaska.net> wrote:

> On 9-6-2012 14:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 09/06/2012 12:25, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> >> Thanks for your quick answer. Incidentally, I am at this moment
> >> also preparing a maintainer update for a new version of math/ess.
> >> Should I perpare two PRs, one for the CONFLICTS and one for the
> >> actual update or is it permissable to pack these two into one?
> > 
> > It is best to put all the changes you want to make into one PR.
> > That will get it processed most efficiently.
> 
> And if there's a PR for the conflict problem, then mention in your
> update PR that this update "closes PR xxxxxx".
> 

Thanks for reminding me, I would surely have forgotten. However, closing
another PR does not apply, I was approached using private mail by a
group apparently implementing something like a FreeBSD ports conflicts
checker, who are systematically combing the ports tree for conflicts not
yet known by the maintainers.

Some maintainer update PRs already adress problems thus found. 

Thanks, cheers, 
-- 
Christopher J. Ruwe
TZ: GMT + 1h
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120610/6a107681/signature.pgp