[HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng

[Mel Flynn]

On 2-6-2012 15:24, Chris Rees wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2012 1:57 PM, "Mel Flynn" <rflynn at acsalaska.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 12-5-2012 5:41, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>>
>>> All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki:
>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG
>>
>> Sorry to jump in late, but it just occurred to me that I have a valid
>> case for "zero or 1" multi options or implemented slightly different, a
>> case for "if single is on, multigroup needs one, else multigroup must be
> 0"
>> The specific case is this:
>> - User can opt to force runtime dependency on a web server by selecting
>> one of 4 or none.
>>
> 
> Just put a dummy option NOWEBSERVER or something in the singlegroup.

I'll think I'll go for "NONE" to avoid NO/WITHOUT namespaces.

-- 
Mel