recent portrevision bump for libvpx
Alexander Leidinger
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Fri Feb 17 14:47:30 UTC 2012
Quoting Alex Dupre <ale at FreeBSD.org> (from Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:39 +0100):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> When I made the EXPLICIT_PACKAGE_DEPENDS patch, I noticed that there is
>> not only libtool at fault (reaction of the libtool developers was IIRC:
>> it's not trivial to fix known problems for the cross-building case (for
>> libtool-1.x?)), but also pkg-config and similar things
>
> Yes, I know, it's correct what you say, but this doesn't prevent to
> improve things. I'm not saying that tomorrow we'll have a perfect
I didn't tell it to prevent things. Just to make sure everyone knows
the state of afairs.
> ports tree where all and only direct dependencies will be listed,
> but if we don't even start...
> Currently we have exactly the opposite case: ports that have direct
> (maybe not needed) dependencies to libraries that are not recorded
> in Makefiles. This is the root cause of "portmaster -r" or
> aggressive bumps.
It could be an option to call the script in each tinderbox build and
verify the result with what is available in LIB_DEPENDS. This would
require extending the script with recent additions to USE_GNOME,
USE_X11, ...
Bye,
Alexander.
--
BOFH excuse #383:
Your processor has taken a ride to Heaven's Gate on the UFO behind
Hale-Bopp's comet
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list