Please test your commits

Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Sun Feb 12 21:17:45 UTC 2012


On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:52:56PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2012 20:45, "Steve Kargl" <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > laptop:root[252]  uname -a
> > FreeBSD laptop 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r230975M: Sat Feb  4
> 09:03:27 PST 2012     root at laptop:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MOBILE  i386
> 
> Well, that immediately shows that this is a 10.0 error, which means it's
> almost certainly due to freebsd1* being matched in some configure script.
> 

Empirical evidence suggests that ghostscript9 developers are using
a newer version of the autotools.

laptop:root[262] find . -name configure | xargs grep -i "freebsd\[1" | more
./lcms/configure:    freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
./lcms/configure:  freebsd[12].*)
./lcms/configure:    freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
./lcms/configure:    freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
./lcms/configure:    freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
./freetype/builds/unix/configure:    freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
./lcms2/configure:    freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
./lcms2/configure:      freebsd[12].*)
./lcms2/configure:    freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
laptop:root[263] find . -name configure | xargs grep -i "freebsd1" | more
./lcms/configure:    freebsd1.*)
./lcms/configure:freebsd1.*)
./lcms/configure:freebsd1.*)
./lcms/configure:    freebsd1.*)
./lcms/configure:freebsd1.*)
./lcms/configure:    freebsd1.*)
./lcms/configure:freebsd1.*)
./freetype/builds/unix/configure:    freebsd1.*)
./freetype/builds/unix/configure:freebsd1.*)
./lcms2/configure:    freebsd1.*)
./lcms2/configure:freebsd1.*)

The malloc issue will not appear on amd64 because the problematic
code is 

	#elif !defined(__amd64__) && !defined(__APPLE__)
		#define HAVE_MEMALIGN
		#include <malloc.h>			
	#endif

with the obvious fix

	#elif !defined(__amd64__) && !defined(__APPLE__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__)	
		#define HAVE_MEMALIGN
		#include <malloc.h>			
	#endif

But, the 2nd issue with too many arguments in a function call is
clearly evident on amd64 because I justed test that on FreeBSD 10.

-- 
Steve


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list