need 10. exp run? kusefs-kmod?

[Steve Wills]

I've got a 10-CURRENT build in my tinderbox. I'll kick off building it and
everything that depends on it there, on both 10-CURRENT and 7.x, 8.x and
9.x. I think exp-run is overkill for something non-infrastructure like
this. Assuming no build breakage, I'd say it's fine to commit.

Steve

> Tested on 8.2, and 9.0, tinderbox logs fine (you will notice scons tries
> to delete an extra egg... I will that, but that is a different pr)
>
> submitter has 10.0, maintainer has 8.2.
>
> Can I get some testing on 10.0 for this? pr has specific code looking
> for 10.x:
>
> +#if __FreeBSD_version>= 1000005
> ++    if (checkpath(dir, mntpath) != 0)
> ++            err(1, "%s", mntpath);
> ++#else
> +      (void)checkpath(dir, mntpath);
> ++#endif
>
>
> pr is http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164218
>
> patch (with portsrevision added):
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell/pr_164218_sysutils_fusefs-kmod.patch
> --
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> o: 561-999-5000
> d: 561-948-2259
>  >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
>
>     * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
>     * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
>     * Hot Company Finalist 2011
>     * Best Email Security Product
>     * Certified SNORT Integrator
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>