need porting advice: one tool from a larger package

[Rodrigo OSORIO]

Hi,

The "i2c-tools" name makes sense to me, and
the ability to add extra tools by configuration
could be awesome.

- rodrigo
 

On 17/04/12 12:49 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> There is a package of a variety of tools, i2c-tools
> (http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/I2CTools).
> I want to port to FreeBSD only a single tool from that package, decode-dimms.
> How should I name my port, "i2c-tools" or "decode-dimms"?
> In my opinion, "decode-dimms" has an advantage of being honest and
> straightforward, but "i2c-tools" has an advantage of preserving the original
> upstream package name.  In the future someone might want to port another tool
> from that package and instead of having to create a new port they could just add
> necessary patches and modify the install target and the plist.
> 
> Thank you.
> -- 
> Andriy Gapon
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"