FAQ on PORTREVISION bump?

[Philip M. Gollucci]

On 04/05/12 20:04, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> But from a users perspective, why do through the problems of rebuilding
> a port, (bringing in updated dependencies, conflicts regression
> testing), just to delete 100K from his ../share directory?
Thats a larger argument.

pav@ would ask why do we both with NO* when its clearly much easier to
just rm -rf /usr/local/share after your done installing.



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci at p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Member,                           Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Director Operations,              Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120405/18ab9c1f/signature.pgp