sysutils/cfs
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.com
Fri Sep 9 00:26:59 UTC 2011
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
> > I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round, whether
> > it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and interference, I'd install
> > Ubuntu.
>
> No, you'd use a managed installation. Nobody stands there pointing a
> gun at your head and forces you to uninstall a port that got removed
> from the ports/ tree. If people could recognize that, it might help get
> the derailed discussion back on the right track.
Recent butchery degrading ports/ has been unprofessional. Denying
users are best to decide for themselves in light of their own circustance,
is not acceptable. FreeBSD is for skilled Users not the clueless.
Commit bit[s] should be revoked before FreeBSD incures more damage.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script.
Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17th Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ Oct.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list