2nd deprecation campaign

[Baptiste Daroussin]

2011/6/17 Lang Hai <freealson at gmail.com>:
>
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>>> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be excluded from this depreciation.
>>
>> That is the way it is done, anyway there still could be some false
>> positive having people to doulble check is always good :)
> Agreed, but I just feel like these ports should not be in the depreciation list at the first place. That's my point my I could be wrong.
>>
>>>>
>>> So yes, always give people chance to fix ports, not remove them from the tree.
>>>
>>> And, do we have a list of all maintainer-wanted ports, because that would be great if we have.
>> Here you are :)
>> http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=maintainer&method=exact&query=ports@FreeBSD.org
>>
> What if we just put all un-maintained ports in this list instead of in the depreciation list?

They already are in this list :) That is this list I'm trying to cleanup

>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hai Lang
>>
>> regards,
>> Bapt
>
> Regards,
> Hai Lang_______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>