diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

David Southwell david at vizion2000.net
Tue Jan 4 17:17:15 UTC 2011


Can people please stick to plain text.
This is really quite unreadable

Thanks
> 
Hello!
 
diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, > build almost ~1 year old portstree on a 
tinderbox with preinstalled > environment.
please, don't rely on it in real > environment.
 
correct solution is switch to > builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), 
which always will use > correct system libraries
of course, after build native jdk, > diablo package should be dropped.
 
05.01.2011, > 02:24, "David Southwell" <david at vizion2000.net>:
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> Hello!
>
> 05.01.2011, 01:00, "J. Hellenthal" < 
href="mailto:jhell at DataIX.net%3E">jhell at DataIX.net>;:
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> > On 01/04/2011 09:37, > David 
Southwell wrote:
> > >>  Hi
> > >>
> >> >  pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> >>
> >>  diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: > /usr/local/diablo-
> > >>  jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses > libodbcinst.so
> > >>
> >> >  Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 > ?
> >>
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> >>  When attempting > to install 
databases/libodbc++  (includes unixODBC)
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> >> which would > presumably fix this 
issue I receive the console report:
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> >>
> >>  unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts > with installed package(s):
> >> >        libiodbc-3.52.7
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> >> >        virtuoso-6.1.2_1
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> >>
> >>  I need virtuoso on this > system.
> >>
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> >>  How do I > preceed?
> >
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> > Replace libiodbc with > unixODBC
> >
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> > They provide the same > layer that 
virtuoso would need for ODBC.
>
> > Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist > in
> libiodbc and > required by virtuoso.
 
OK guys now I > AM confused!!
 
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">Question is what will work?
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">Kurt Jaeger < 
href="mailto:lists at opsec.eu%3E">lists at opsec.eu>; suggests:
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"> 
A:
_______________________________________
 
>/usr/local/include/sql.h
 
>which > contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">>ODBC, so it's pretty much the > same 
contents, but it's formatted
>differently.
 
>What I > would suggest:
 
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">>cd > /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/
make deinstall
>cd > /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/
make install
>cd > /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++
make install
>cd > /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/
make install
>cd > /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/
make deinstall
>cd > /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/
make reinstall
 
>This is > messy.
______________________________________
 
& B
 
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">>Some other suggestion:
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"> 
>File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to > seperate their two sql.h
>files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist
style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"> 
Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option?
> 
 
 
-- 
Dima Panov > (fluffy at FreeBSD.org)
KDE at FreeBSD team

Facebook: > http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157 

Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list