diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
david at vizion2000.net
Tue Jan 4 16:24:13 UTC 2011
> 05.01.2011, 01:00, "J. Hellenthal" <jhell at DataIX.net>:
> > On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
> >> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
> >> jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
> >> Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
> >> When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC)
> >> which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report:
> >> unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
> >> libiodbc-3.52.7
> >> virtuoso-6.1.2_1
> >> I need virtuoso on this system.
> >> How do I preceed?
> > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
> > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
> Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in
> libiodbc and required by virtuoso.
OK guys now I AM confused!!
Question is what will work?
Kurt Jaeger <lists at opsec.eu> suggests:
>which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement
>ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted
>What I would suggest:
>This is messy.
>Some other suggestion:
>File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h
>files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist
Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option?
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network
More information about the freebsd-ports