[CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

[Baptiste Daroussin]

2011/2/2 Steve Randall <srandall52 at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
> Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dyatko at gmail.com>:
>> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
>> > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all
>> >>
>> >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
>> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
>> >> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
>> >>
>> >> Can you please test it?
>> >>
>> >> by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde and gnome
>> >> integration. (sorry but my poor CPU already hates enough :))
>> >>
>> >> All languages supported are build.
>> >>
>> >> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a
>> >> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30
>> >> with java)
>> >>
>> >> at this points :
>> >> there is (I guess) only one remaining problem :
>> >> which launching libreoffice it can't find it libraries, I haven't
>> >> decided yet wether to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the wrapper script or to
>> >> add ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib and ldconfig -m
>> >> ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/base3.3/program
>> >>
>> >> maybe it conflicts with openoffice I haven't checked yet.
>> >>
>> >> to test it you will need a fresh ports tree (the needed libtextcat
>> >> modification was committed yesterday thanks thierry@)
>> >>
>> >> the mandatory screenshot :
>> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice-3.3.0-final.png
>> >>
>> >> I expect to be able to push it in the tree during next week (after
>> >> finding a good way to deal with the libraries and checked if it
>> >> conflicts with openoffice)
>> >>
>> >> I would like to thanks Robert Nagy from openbsd, he has made all the
>> >> hard work :), he was also very helpful.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Thanks for work!
>
> I second that.
>
>
>> >
>> > I have one comment:
>> >
>> > [tiger at tiger]~%pkg_info -xI libreo
>> > libreoffice-3.3.0   Full integrated office productivity suite
>> >
>> > now I'm trying `pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0` but got errors:
>> >
>> > tiger# pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0
>> > tar: lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No
>> > such file or directory
>> > tar:
>> > lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/deploymentfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No
>> > such file or directory
>> >
>> > [tiger at tiger]~%pkg_info -xL libreo |grep basprovfx.uno.so
>> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so
>> >
>> > [tiger at tiger]~%file /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so
>> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: cannot
>> > open `/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so' (No
>> > such file or directory)
>> >
>> > tiger# find work/ -type f -name basprovfx.uno.so
>> > tiger# pwd
>> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice
>> >
>> > broken pkg-plist ?
>> >
>> >> regards,
>> >> Bapt
>> >
>> > --
>> > wbr, tiger
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>> >
>>
>> seems like but I really don't know how to figure out what you have or
>> have not in your box that prevent basprovfx.uno.so and consors to be
>> built
>
> Have you tried building on i386? It looks like you generated the
> packing list on amd64. I'm not sure if that explains basprovfx.uno.so,
> but it's definitely a problem.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
Yes I did try on i386.

---
Bapt