Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
Pav Lucistnik
pav at FreeBSD.org
Mon Dec 5 17:20:50 UTC 2011
Brooks Davis píše v po 05. 12. 2011 v 10:15 -0600:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> > until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
> > needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
> > that's fine.
>
> We don't actually need to add a bsd.pure.mk to upgrade llvm. We would
> need to complete the repocopy in ports/163030 and change the build and
> run depends in lang/pure which would change the depends of the 12ish
> ports involved. Similar changes are needed in a couple other ports.
>
> I'll leave it up to portmgr to decide if that's too disruptive. IMO if
> any change of this scope (an upgrade triggering less than dozen rebuilds,
> mostly of ports that aren't widely used) should be approved, it should
> be this one given our general toolchain focus.
Just put it under /usr/ports/lang/pure/bsd.pure.mk and be done with it.
We can always move it to /usr/ports/Mk later.
--
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
God is real unless declared integer.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20111205/f79dc814/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list