Manually registering dependencies for ports
Matthew Seaman
m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk
Tue Jun 8 13:27:59 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2010 08:53:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> So, you're creating your own meta-port that exists only to be depended
> on by the ports you specifically want to have installed? That's a
> really good idea. You might need to fill out the contents of your
> "wanted-ports" meta-port a bit more, but the concept seems sound to me.
Actually, I thought this was a good enough idea that I had a go at
implementing it. My first cut at doing this is available at:
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/wanted-ports.shar
What do people think? Unless this meets with utter horror or there are
some horrendous bugs, I'll tidy it up, add a man page and submit it as a
new port in a week or so.
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matthew at infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkwORVYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzwegCaAhV/gRXkKLkjD7627SrkJGho
hJ0AnjNI9kVYN8h4xVgg9gtq9XO+JeRT
=lygQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list