[ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Wed Apr 14 06:15:33 UTC 2010
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:03:22 -0700
Ted Faber <faber at isi.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands
> > ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA
> > is 6-7 April.
>
> I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still
> unstable?
ATM no, as it's apparent from the message bellow.
Update to that message:
- Gnome and KDE are ready
- Xorg is believed to be ready, an -exp run on pointy is beginning
today.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700
Charlie Kester <corky1951 at comcast.net> wrote:
> On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands
> >ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is
> >6-7 April.
> >
> >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared
> >lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected.
> >
> >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done,
> >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing /
> >fixing.
> >
> >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and
> >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built
> >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even
> >fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the
> >problems.
> >
> >
> >Thank you,
> >
> >With hat: portmgr@
>
>
> Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the
> original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree
> considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA?
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu at FreeBSD.org>
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: stable at freebsd.org, questions at freebsd.org, freebsd-ports at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:31:33 +0300
Just a status update:
PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed.
Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is
working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems.
>>>> still work to do
I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow
morning.
>>> Gnome -exp done, there's a showstopper on amd64 that we weren't aware
>>> of. about 40 fixesso far. An other -exp needed.
>>>> KDE in progress.
Packages status:
- i386:
- 6 after png and curl
- 7 after png and curl
- an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished
>>>>finished
- 9 pacakges are from middle March
>>> from 9 Apr.
- amd64:
- 6 packages are post png and curl
- 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow
- 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we
won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of
resources).
>>> in progress, with ports from yesterday
- 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib
problem).
>>>> nope, still old packages.
In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome
and KDE now it's a good moment.
>>> So no clear ETA yet, a few days more.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20100414/8854333f/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list