sysutils/libcdio provides no cdio_paranoia.0 for ports/devel/gvfs

[Julian H. Stacey]

Hi Tılman Linneweh & Koop Mast,

Reference:
> From:		Koop Mast <kwm at FreeBSD.org> 
> Date:		Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:47:21 +0100 
> Message-id:	<1258379241.48450.7.camel at headache.rainbow-runner.nl> 

Koop Mast wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 10:51 +0100, Týlman Linneweh wrote:
> > Hello Julian!
> > 
> > (CC: devel/gvfs maintainer added)
> > 
> > Thanks for reporting this issue. 
> > 
> > On Nov 15, 2009, at 22:51 , Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > int would be welcome please with sysutils/libcdio, Paranoia stuff seems
> > > broken, but I'm not clear what's intended, hence mail rather than a send-pr.
> > > 
> > > 	===>   gvfs-1.2.1 depends on shared library: cdio_paranoia.0 - not found
> > > 	===>    Verifying install for cdio_paranoia.0 in \
> > > 		/usr/ports/sysutils/libcdio
> > > 	===>   Returning to build of gvfs-1.2.1
> > > 	Error: shared library "cdio_paranoia.0" does not exist
> > > /usr/ports/devel/gvfs ; make
> > > 	===>   gvfs-1.2.1 depends on shared library: cdio_paranoia.0 - not found
> > > 	===>    Verifying install for cdio_paranoia.0 in \
> > > 		/usr/ports/sysutils/libcdio
> > > 	===>   Returning to build of gvfs-1.2.1
> > > 	Error: shared library "cdio_paranoia.0" does not exist
> > 
> > There are two easy possible solutions.
> > a) make gvfs depend on libcdio.so instead of the non-default cdio_paranoia.0 library
> > b) Change libcdio to install cdio_paranoia.0 by default. 
> > 
> > Question to gnome@ - Does gvfs really need the cdio_paranoia library, or is this just a bug
> > in the port Makefile and it is ok with the libcdio library?
> 
> a) The configure script of the gvfs port checks for cdio_paranoia
> library. It needs it for the cdda backend. 
> b) libcdio already got a option for paranoia support and it is default
> to on.
> 
> Julian you can do two things now. Either you disable the cdda backend in
> gvfs with the WITH_CDDA option. Or build libcdio with paranoia support.
> 
> -Koop

OK Thanks, I'll try both (but not at same time :-) ... 
I've not tried just yet as another big compile running.

I'd request one of the 2 ports be changed please, so that
by default, without changing either default options,
the 2 Makefiles are compatible when called from above, eg from
/usr/ports/net-mgmt/etherape

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Mail plain text not quoted-printable, HTML or Base64:  http://asciiribbon.org
  Vote For Smoke Free Bavarian Pubs Restaurants http://berklix.org/~jhs/nim/