emulators/linux_base-f10 = Fedora 8?

[Pav Lucistnik]

Doug Barton píše v út 02. 06. 2009 v 13:50 -0700:
> Mark Linimon wrote:
> >>>> Then mark the port BROKEN, or some such. User confusion is a bad thing. :)
> >>> s/BROKEN/IGNORE/
> >> Just wonder, can/should it be implemented automagically via
> >> the repocopy script?
> > 
> > I have no opinion, but will note that as long as you don't connect
> > the ports to the category Makefile, you don't need to worry about
> > things like this :-)
> 
> The problem that I responded to was users who surf into those
> directories that expect useful things to happen. That problem isn't
> fixed by not hooking them up.
> 
> If it's easy to add this feature to the repocopy script then I would
> suggest it be done.

How about abandoning the whole concept of repocopies instead?

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>
Bento's Law: If It Can Break, It Will Break Bento's Corollary: If It Can
Break, Kris Can Send Mail About It
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20090602/3666bd7c/attachment.pgp