amule 2.2.3 port - ready for test

Bernhard Fröhlich decke at
Sun Jan 18 10:51:00 PST 2009

On Sun, January 18, 2009 1:05 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello,
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich <decke at>
> wrote:
>> On Sat, January 10, 2009 5:28 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Bernhard Froehlich <decke at>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I've applied your patch and compiled the port in an i386 Tinderbox for
>>>> 6-STABLE and 7-STABLE. It compiles fine but leaves a few files behind
>>>> and deletes a few directories which it shouldn't.
>>> Thanks for testing. A new patch will be sent to the mailing list.
>>> I really must get my own tinderbox running again soon.
>> I've build your -5 patch and tinderbox keeps complaining about some
>> missing directories.
> I'm still having problems getting my own tinderbox to run. Maybe I
> should just reinstall it (it was upgraded).
> amule - I wonder why 'port test' doesn't complain about missing files
> like your tinderbox does?

To be exact tinderbox complains about some directories that you have
removed but you shouldn't. So just remove these lines from pkg-plist and
tinderbox should be happy with it.

portlint and port-tools are great tools for a quick check but a tinderbox
can detect a lot more errors because it builds the ports in a clean
environment so none of them can replace one another. Use them in
combination and you catch most of the errors.

Bernhard Fröhlich

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list