Migration to new SourceForge url scheme now inevitable,
solution
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Fri Aug 21 11:12:15 UTC 2009
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:06:18 +0200
Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Dmitry Marakasov píše v pá 21. 08. 2009 v 07:50 +0400:
>
> > [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sfp.patch
> > [2] http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sfp.log
>
> This looks good so far.
>
> > PS. Btw, SOURCEFORGE_EXTENDED and SOURCEFORGE_JP still use an old
> > scheme. Because of that SFE can no longer include SF, and honestly,
> > I
>
> JP is completely separate thing, so I'd leave it alone for now.
> SF_E can be axed if all the files fetch from regular SF. IIRC there
> were some projects in the past that were only distributed on SF_E
> sites, not on SF sites?
From what I remember SF_E were carrying only part of the things
available on SF.
--
(__) IOnut (__)
(.''/// \\\'',)
^ / \/ \/ \ ^
(_\. /. .\. /_)
==============================
BOFH excuse #400:
We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it
is an undocumented feature.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20090821/8308cc18/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list