Migration to new SourceForge url scheme now inevitable, solution

[Pav Lucistnik]

Dmitry Marakasov píše v čt 20. 08. 2009 v 20:40 +0400:
> * Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_lists at tx.rr.com) wrote:
> 
> > I've been following this discussion closely since several of my ports fetch 
> > from Sourceforge.  Is it safe to assume that some global solution will be 
> > applied to the ports tree?  Or are we maintainers going to need to submit PRs 
> > for affected ports once a solution is agreed upon?
> 
> This should be done globally, or else we'll end up with 90% unfetchable
> SF ports for 8.0 release. I'm preparing the patch currently.

Once you have a patch, send it over for eyeball-review and approval.
Thanks for attacking this!

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20090820/86e6da86/attachment.pgp